Previously, our code would send back an error if the socks5 request
parser said anything but DONE. But there are other non-error cases,
like TRUNCATED: we shouldn't send back errors for them.
This patch lowers the responsibility for setting the error message
into the parsing code, since the actual type of the error message
will depend on what problem was encountered.
Fixes bug 40190; bugfix on 0.3.5.1-alpha.
Typos found with codespell.
Please keep in mind that this should have impact on actual code
and must be carefully evaluated:
src/core/or/lttng_circuit.inc
- ctf_enum_value("CONTROLER", CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER)
+ ctf_enum_value("CONTROLLER", CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER)
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.3 version.)
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
Using a standard ending here will let other tools that expect
markdown understand our output here.
This commit was automatically generated with:
for fn in $(find src -name '*.dox'); do \
git mv "$fn" "${fn%.dox}.md"; \
done
When a SOCKS5 client sends a RESOLVE_PTR request, it must include
either an IPv4 or IPv6 address. In the past this was required to be a
binary address (address types 1 or 4), but since the refactoring of
SOCKS5 support in Tor 0.3.5.1-alpha, strings (address type 3) are also
allowed if they represent an IPv4 or IPv6 literal.
However, when a binary IPv6 address is provided,
parse_socks5_client_request converts it into a string enclosed in
brackets. This doesn't match what string_is_valid_ipv6_address
expects, so this would fail with the error "socks5 received
RESOLVE_PTR command with hostname type. Rejecting."
By replacing string_is_valid_ipv4_address/string_is_valid_ipv6_address
with tor_addr_parse, we accept strings both with and without brackets.
This fixes the handling of binary addresses, and also improves
symmetry with CONNECT and RESOLVE requests.
Fixes bug 32315.
This includes app, core, feature, lib, and tools, but excludes
ext, test, and trunnel.
This was generated by the following shell script:
cd src
for dname in $(find lib core feature app tools -type d |grep -v \\.deps$); do
keyword="$(echo "$dname" |sed -e "s/\//_/" )"
target="${dname}/${keyword}.dox"
echo "$target"
cat <<EOF >"$target"
/**
@dir ${dname}
@brief ${dname}
**/
EOF
git add "$target"
done
If a file doesn't use the file command (either \file or @file),
Doxygen won't try to process it.
These declarations also turned up a doxygen warning for
proto_socks.c; I fixed that too.
A .may_includes file can be "advisory", which means that some
violations of the rules are expected. We will track these
violations with practracker, not as automatic errors.
These confused GCC LTO, which thought they might be used
uninitialized. I'm pretty sure that as long as 'res' indicates
success, they will always be set to something, but let's unconfuse
the compiler in any case.
The trunnel functions are written under the assumption that their
allocators can fail, so GCC LTO thinks they might return NULL. In
point of fact, they're using tor_malloc() and friends, which can't
fail, but GCC won't necessarily figure that out.
Fixes part of #27772.
Coverity rightly complains that early in the function we're checking
whether username is NULL, and later we're passing it unconditionally
to strlen().
Fixes CID 1437967. Bug not in any released Tor.
This commit won't build yet -- it just puts everything in a slightly
more logical place.
The reasoning here is that "src/core" will hold the stuff that every (or
nearly every) tor instance will need in order to do onion routing.
Other features (including some necessary ones) will live in
"src/feature". The "src/app" directory will hold the stuff needed
to have Tor be an application you can actually run.
This commit DOES NOT refactor the former contents of src/or into a
logical set of acyclic libraries, or change any code at all. That
will have to come in the future.
We will continue to move things around and split them in the future,
but I hope this lays a reasonable groundwork for doing so.
Nick Mathewson
David Goulet
Samanta Navarro
teor
Suphanat Chunhapanya
liberat
rl1987
cypherpunks
Roger Dingledine