Now that we don't have version 2, it gives us:
[warn] HiddenServiceVersion must be between 3 and 3, not 2.
This commit changes it to:
[warn] HiddenServiceVersion must be 3, not 2.
Part of #40476
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Some tests were removed because they were testing something not usable
anymore.
Some tests remains to make sure that things are indeed disabled.
Part of #40476
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Relay do not accept both stores and lookups of version 2 descriptor.
This effectively disable version 2 HSDir supports for relays.
Part of #40476
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Upon receiving a v2 introduction request, the relay will close the
circuit and send back a tor protocol error.
Part of #40476
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The minimum service version is raised from 2 to 3 which effectively
disable loading or creating an onion service v2.
As for ADD_ONION, for version 2, a 551 error is returned:
"551 Failed to add Onion Service"
Part of #40476
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This effectively turns off the ability of tor to use HSv2 as a client by
invalidating the v2 onion hostname passed through a SOCKS request.
Part of #40476
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We currently assume that the only way for Tor to listen on ports in the
privileged port range (1 to 1023), on Linux, is if we are granted the
NET_BIND_SERVICE capability. Today on Linux, it's possible to specify
the beginning of the unprivileged port range using a sysctl
configuration option. Docker (and thus the CI service Tor uses) recently
changed this sysctl value to 0, which causes our tests to fail as they
assume that we should NOT be able to bind to a privileged port *without*
the NET_BIND_SERVICE capability.
In this patch, we read the value of the sysctl value via the /proc/sys/
filesystem iff it's present, otherwise we assume the default
unprivileged port range begins at port 1024.
See: tor#40275
Fixes bug 40078.
As reported by hdevalence our batch verification logic can cause an assert
crash.
The assert happens because when the batch verification of ed25519-donna fails,
the code in `ed25519_checksig_batch()` falls back to doing a single
verification for each signature.
The crash occurs because batch verification failed, but then all signatures
individually verified just fine.
That's because batch verification and single verification use a different
equation which means that there are sigs that can pass single verification
but fail batch verification.
Fixing this would require modding ed25519-donna which is not in scope for
this ticket, and will be soon deprecated in favor of arti and
ed25519-dalek, so my branch instead removes batch verification.
Roger Dingledine
David Goulet
Alexander Færøy
Nick Mathewson
George Kadianakis