mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-12-06 19:41:15 +01:00
cleanups, and remove some unreachable code.
svn:r5727
This commit is contained in:
+5
-6
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ dirserv_get_status_impl(const char *fp, const char *nickname,
|
||||
return FP_REJECT;
|
||||
} else if (!strcasecmp(fp_ent->nickname, "!invalid")) {
|
||||
if (msg)
|
||||
*msg = "Fingerprint is marged invalid";
|
||||
*msg = "Fingerprint is marked invalid";
|
||||
return FP_INVALID;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ dirserv_get_status_impl(const char *fp, const char *nickname,
|
||||
|
||||
if (rej == ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED || rej == ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED) {
|
||||
if (should_log)
|
||||
info(LD_DIRSERV, "Rejecting '%s' because of address %s",
|
||||
info(LD_DIRSERV, "Rejecting '%s' because of address '%s'",
|
||||
nickname, address);
|
||||
if (msg)
|
||||
*msg = "Authdir is rejecting routers in this range.";
|
||||
@@ -323,17 +323,16 @@ dirserv_get_status_impl(const char *fp, const char *nickname,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (inv == ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED || inv == ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED) {
|
||||
if (should_log)
|
||||
info(LD_DIRSERV, "Not marking '%s' valid because of address %s",
|
||||
info(LD_DIRSERV, "Not marking '%s' valid because of address '%s'",
|
||||
nickname, address);
|
||||
return FP_INVALID;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (should_log)
|
||||
debug(LD_DIRSERV,"No fingerprint found for '%s'",nickname);
|
||||
if (!platform || tor_version_as_new_as(platform,"0.1.0.2-rc"))
|
||||
return reject_unlisted ? FP_REJECT : FP_VALID;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return FP_INVALID;
|
||||
if (should_log)
|
||||
info(LD_DIRSERV,"No fingerprint found for '%s'",nickname);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (0==strcasecmp(nn_ent->fingerprint, fp)) {
|
||||
if (should_log)
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-7
@@ -3241,18 +3241,12 @@ router_list_client_downloadable(void)
|
||||
} else if (digestmap_get(downloading, rs->status.descriptor_digest)) {
|
||||
/* We're downloading this one now. */
|
||||
++n_in_progress;
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
/* Authorities don't call this path any longer. */
|
||||
} else if (options->AuthoritativeDir &&
|
||||
dirserv_would_reject_router(&rs->status)) {
|
||||
++n_would_reject;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
} else if (router_get_by_descriptor_digest(rs->status.descriptor_digest)) {
|
||||
/* We have the 'best' descriptor for this router. */
|
||||
++n_uptodate;
|
||||
} else if ((ri = router_get_by_digest(rs->status.identity_digest)) &&
|
||||
ri->cache_info.published_on > rs->status.published_on) {
|
||||
/* Oddly, we have a descriptor more resent than the 'best' one, but it
|
||||
/* Oddly, we have a descriptor more recent than the 'best' one, but it
|
||||
was once best. So that's okay. */
|
||||
++n_uptodate;
|
||||
} else if (rs->status.published_on + ESTIMATED_PROPAGATION_TIME > now) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user