tor_vsscanf(): Don't return -1 if '%%' doesn't match.

tor_vsscanf() is supposed to return the current number of matches on
match failure.
This commit is contained in:
George Kadianakis
2012-04-03 16:20:24 +02:00
parent 42143979d8
commit b80728a115
3 changed files with 9 additions and 2 deletions
+3
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
o Minor bugfixes
- Enforce correct return behavior of tor_vsscanf(), when the '%%'
pattern is used. Fixes bug 5558.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -2773,7 +2773,7 @@ tor_vsscanf(const char *buf, const char *pattern, va_list ap)
++n_matched;
} else if (*pattern == '%') {
if (*buf != '%')
return -1;
return n_matched;
++buf;
++pattern;
} else {
+5 -1
View File
@@ -1384,7 +1384,6 @@ test_util_sscanf(void)
test_eq(-1, tor_sscanf("wrong", "%5c", s1)); /* %c cannot have a number. */
test_eq(-1, tor_sscanf("hello", "%s", s1)); /* %s needs a number. */
test_eq(-1, tor_sscanf("prettylongstring", "%999999s", s1));
test_eq(-1, tor_sscanf("We're the 99 monkeys", "We're the 99%%"));
#if 0
/* GCC thinks these two are illegal. */
test_eq(-1, tor_sscanf("prettylongstring", "%0s", s1));
@@ -1468,6 +1467,11 @@ test_util_sscanf(void)
/* Literal '%' (ie. '%%') */
test_eq(1, tor_sscanf("99% fresh", "%3u%% fresh", &u1));
test_eq(99, u1);
test_eq(0, tor_sscanf("99 fresh", "%% %3u %s", &u1, s1));
test_eq(1, tor_sscanf("99 fresh", "%3u%% %s", &u1, s1));
test_eq(2, tor_sscanf("99 fresh", "%3u %5s %%", &u1, s1));
test_eq(99, u1);
test_streq(s1, "fresh");
test_eq(1, tor_sscanf("% boo", "%% %3s", s1));
test_streq("boo", s1);