mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-12-06 19:41:15 +01:00
r9299@totoro: nickm | 2006-11-12 17:05:09 -0500
mention that Tor provides anonymity and that anonymity is important. Heh. svn:r8939
This commit is contained in:
@@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ location~\cite{google-geolocation}.
|
||||
The Tor design provides other features as well that are not typically
|
||||
present in manual or ad hoc circumvention techniques.
|
||||
|
||||
First, the Tor directory authorities automatically aggregate, test,
|
||||
First, Tor has a fairly mature way to distribute information about servers.
|
||||
Tor directory authorities automatically aggregate, test,
|
||||
and publish signed summaries of the available Tor routers. Tor clients
|
||||
can fetch these summaries to learn which routers are available and
|
||||
which routers are suitable for their needs. Directory information is cached
|
||||
@@ -283,8 +284,8 @@ need to interact with the authorities directly. (To tolerate a minority
|
||||
of compromised directory authorities, we use a threshold trust scheme---
|
||||
see Section~\ref{subsec:trust-chain} for details.)
|
||||
|
||||
Second, Tor clients can be configured to use any directory authorities
|
||||
they want. They use the default authorities if no others are specified,
|
||||
Second, the list of directory authorities is not hard-wired.
|
||||
Clients use the default authorities if no others are specified,
|
||||
but it's easy to start a separate (or even overlapping) Tor network just
|
||||
by running a different set of authorities and convincing users to prefer
|
||||
a modified client. For example, we could launch a distinct Tor network
|
||||
@@ -345,6 +346,17 @@ network~\cite{econymics,usability:weis2006}. This user base also provides
|
||||
something else: hundreds of thousands of different and often-changing
|
||||
addresses that we can leverage for our blocking-resistance design.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally and perhaps most importantly, Tor provides anonymity and prevents any
|
||||
single server from linking users to their communication partners. Despite
|
||||
initial appearances, {\it distributed-trust anonymity is critical for
|
||||
anticensorship efforts}. If any single server can expose dissident bloggers
|
||||
or compile a list of users' behavior, the censors can profitably compromise
|
||||
that server's operator applying economic pressure to their employers,
|
||||
breaking into their computer, pressuring their family (if they have relatives
|
||||
in the censored area), or so on. Furthermore, in systems where any relay can
|
||||
expose its users, the censors can spread suspicion that they are running some
|
||||
of the relays and use this belief to chill use of the network.
|
||||
|
||||
We discuss and adapt these components further in
|
||||
Section~\ref{sec:bridges}. But first we examine the strengths and
|
||||
weaknesses of other blocking-resistance approaches, so we can expand
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user