For printf, %f and %lf are synonymous, since floats are promoted to
doubles when passed as varargs. It's only for scanf that we need to
say "%lf" for doubles and "%f" for floats.
Apparenly, some older compilers think it's naughty to say %lf and like
to spew warnings about it.
Found by grarpamp.
Previously, if tor_addr_to_str() returned NULL, we would reuse the
last value returned by fmt_addr(). (This could happen if we were
erroneously asked to format an AF_UNSPEC address.) Now instead we
return "???".
The issue was that we overlooked the possibility of reverse DNS success
at the end of connection_ap_handshake_socks_resolved(). Issue discovered
by katmagic, thanks!
We were using strncpy before, which isn't our style for stuff like
this.
This isn't a bug, though: before calling strncpy, we were checking
that strlen(src) was indeed == HEX_DIGEST_LEN, which is less than
sizeof(dst), so there was no way we could fail to NUL-terminate.
Still, strncpy(a,b,sizeof(a)) is an idiom that we ought to squash
everyplace.
Fixes CID #427.
Using strncpy meant that if listenaddress were ever >=
sizeof(sockaddr_un.sun_path), we would fail to nul-terminate
sun_path. This isn't a big deal: we never read sun_path, and the
kernel is smart enough to reject the sockaddr_un if it isn't
nul-terminated. Nonetheless, it's a dumb failure mode. Instead, we
should reject addresses that don't fit in sockaddr_un.sun_path.
Coverity found this; it's CID 428. Bugfix on 0.2.0.3-alpha.
When we rejected a descriptor for not being the one we wanted, we
were letting the parsed descriptor go out of scope.
Found by Coverity; CID # 30.
Bugfix on 0.2.1.26.
(No changes file yet, since this is not in any 0.2.1.x release.)
I'm not one to insist on C's miserly stack limits, but allocating a
256K array on the stack is too much even for me.
Bugfix on 0.2.1.7-alpha. Found by coverity. Fixes CID # 450.
Roger Dingledine
Nick Mathewson
Sebastian Hahn
Gisle Vanem
Robert Ransom
Karsten Loesing