With LibreSSL-3.8.1 these engines are no long available causing a build
failure, but LibreSSL correctly defines OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE as part of its
opensslfeatures.h. However Tor includes crypto_openssl_mgt.h before any
of the openssl includes which would define OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE and then
fails to define DISABLE_ENGINES.
As the define is used in only a single .c file it is best to move it
there.
Signed-off-by: orbea <orbea@riseup.net>
LibreSSL is now closer to OpenSSL 1.1 than OpenSSL 1.0. According to
https://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article;sid=20220116121253, this is the
intention of OpenBSD developers.
According to #40630, many special cases are needed to compile Tor against
LibreSSL 3.5 when using Tor's OpenSSL 1.0 compatibility mode, whereas only a
small number of #defines are required when using OpenSSL 1.1 compatibility
mode. One additional workaround is required for LibreSSL 3.4 compatibility.
Compiles and passes unit tests with LibreSSL 3.4.3 and 3.5.1.
Fixes bug 40078.
As reported by hdevalence our batch verification logic can cause an assert
crash.
The assert happens because when the batch verification of ed25519-donna fails,
the code in `ed25519_checksig_batch()` falls back to doing a single
verification for each signature.
The crash occurs because batch verification failed, but then all signatures
individually verified just fine.
That's because batch verification and single verification use a different
equation which means that there are sigs that can pass single verification
but fail batch verification.
Fixing this would require modding ed25519-donna which is not in scope for
this ticket, and will be soon deprecated in favor of arti and
ed25519-dalek, so my branch instead removes batch verification.
We already did this in a couple of places, but there are more that
we didn't get. This is necessary for systems with versions of
NSS that don't do their prototypes properly.
Fixes#40409; bugfix on 0.3.5.1-alpha.
Previously, we would detect errors from a missing RNG
implementation, but not failures from the RNG code itself.
Fortunately, it appears those failures do not happen in practice
when Tor is using OpenSSL's default RNG implementation. Fixes bug
40390; bugfix on 0.2.8.1-alpha. This issue is also tracked as
TROVE-2021-004. Reported by Jann Horn at Google's Project Zero.
Typos found with codespell.
Please keep in mind that this should have impact on actual code
and must be carefully evaluated:
src/core/or/lttng_circuit.inc
- ctf_enum_value("CONTROLER", CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER)
+ ctf_enum_value("CONTROLLER", CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER)
This way, if we guess wrong about whether the library has it,
we don't conflict with the library's headers.
Fixes#40181; bug not in any released version.
The "engines.h" header has lots of stuff; the "opensslv.h" header
has the version number, which is all we actually need here.
We need to do this because we're about to change this header to
conditionally define OPENSSL_SUPPRESS_DEPRECATED, and it would be
too late to do so if we'd already included "engines.h".
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.3 version.)
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
orbea
Alex Xu (Hello71)
David Goulet
Alexander Færøy
George Kadianakis
Nick Mathewson
Samanta Navarro
Daniel Pinto
teor