When we fixed 25939 in f7633c1fca, we
introduced a call to rescan_periodic_events() from inside the onion
service logic. But this meant that we could rescan the event list --
thereby running event callbacks! -- from inside the hidden service code.
This could cause us to run some of our event callbacks from an
inconsistent state, if we were in the middle of changing options.
A related bug (#25761) prevented us from rescanning our periodic
events as appropriate, but when we fixed THAT one, this bug reared
its ugly head.
The fix here is that "enabling" an event should cause us to run it
from the event loop, but not immediately from the point where we
enable it.
Fixes bug 27003; bugfix on 0.3.4.1-alpha.
Stop putting ed25519 link specifiers in v3 onion service descriptors,
when the intro point doesn't support ed25519 link authentication.
Fixes bug 26627; bugfix on 0.3.2.4-alpha.
The following bug was causing many issues for this branch in chutney:
In sr_state_get_start_time_of_current_protocol_run() we were using the
consensus valid-after to calculate beginning_of_current_round, but we were
using time(NULL) to calculate the current_round slot. This was causing time
sync issues when the consensus valid-after and time(NULL) were disagreeing on
what the current round is. Our fix is to use the consensus valid-after in both
places.
This also means that we are not using 'now' (aka time(NULL)) anymore in that
function, and hence we can remove that argument from the function (and its
callers). I'll do this in the next commit so that we keep things separated.
Furthermore, we fix a unittest that broke.
Now that the rev counter depends on the local time, we need to be more careful
in the unittests. Some unittests were breaking because they were using
consensus values from 1985, but they were not updating the local time
appropriately. That was causing the OPE module to complain that it was trying
to encrypt insanely large values.
This is meant for use when encrypting the current time within the
period in order to get a monotonically increasing revision counter
without actually revealing our view of the time.
This scheme is far from the most state-of-the-art: don't use it for
anything else without careful analysis by somebody much smarter than
I am.
See ticket #25552 for some rationale for this logic.
rl1987
Neel Chauhan
Nick Mathewson
teor
teor
George Kadianakis