We've never actually tested this support, and we should probably assume
it's broken.
To the best of my knowledge, only OpenVMS has this, and even on
OpenVMS it's a compile-time option to disable it. And I don't think
we build on openvms anyway. (Everybody else seems to be working
around the 2038 problem by using a 64-bit time_t, which won't expire
for roughly 292 billion years.)
Closes ticket 18184.
Avoid using a pronoun where it makes comments unclear.
Avoid using gender for things that don't have it.
Avoid assigning gender to people unnecessarily.
Check size argument to memwipe() for underflow.
Closes bug #18089. Reported by "gk", patch by "teor".
Bugfix on 0.2.3.25 and 0.2.4.6-alpha (#7352),
commit 49dd5ef3 on 7 Nov 2012.
LibreSSL doesn't use OpenSSL_version (it uses the older SSLeay_version
API), but it reports a major version number as 2 in
OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER. Instead of fudging the version check, for now,
let's just check if we're using LibreSSL by checking the version number
macro exists, and use compatibility defines unconditionally when we
detect LibreSSL.
When _list() is called with AF_UNSPEC family and fails to enumerate
network interfaces using platform specific API, have it call
_hack() twice to find out IPv4 and/or IPv6 address of a machine Tor
instance is running on. This is correct way to handle this case
because _hack() can only be called with AF_INET and AF_INET6 and
does not support any other address family.
OpenSSL doesn't use them, and fwict they were never called. If some
version of openssl *does* start using them, we should test them before
we turn them back on.
See ticket 17926
This is an eXtendable-Output Function with the following claimed
security strengths against *all* adversaries:
Collision: min(d/2, 256)
Preimage: >= min(d, 256)
2nd Preimage: min(d, 256)
where d is the amount of output used, in bits.
* DIGEST_SHA3_[256,512] added as supported algorithms, which do
exactly what is said on the tin.
* test/bench now benchmarks all of the supported digest algorithms,
so it's possible to see just how slow SHA-3 is, though the message
sizes could probably use tweaking since this is very dependent on
the message size vs the SHA-3 rate.
Nick Mathewson
teor (Tim Wilson-Brown)
Ola Bini
rl1987
cypherpunks
dana koch
Yawning Angel