From a7993bbd72e44868384832af67c03595918b4bfb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Mathewson Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 08:59:51 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Whoops: test the "wrong" name for maxunmeasurdbw (sic). Now that we never use an earlier consensus method, our tests actually hit this, and we find that we have misspelled "maxunmeasurdbw" (sic) in dirvote.c. I have opened ticket #40869 to track this misspelling. --- src/test/test_dir.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/test/test_dir.c b/src/test/test_dir.c index 87aaef7fe6..baf67be4f8 100644 --- a/src/test/test_dir.c +++ b/src/test/test_dir.c @@ -4107,7 +4107,7 @@ vote_tweaks_for_umbw(networkstatus_t *v, int voter, time_t now) NULL, 0, -1); /* If we're using a non-default clip bandwidth, add it to net_params */ if (alternate_clip_bw > 0) { - tor_asprintf(&maxbw_param, "maxunmeasuredbw=%u", alternate_clip_bw); + tor_asprintf(&maxbw_param, "maxunmeasurdbw=%u", alternate_clip_bw); tt_assert(maxbw_param); if (maxbw_param) { smartlist_add(v->net_params, maxbw_param);