Implement stream isolation

This is the meat of proposal 171: we change circuit_is_acceptable()
to require that the connection is compatible with every connection
that has been linked to the circuit; we update circuit_is_better to
prefer attaching streams to circuits in the way that decreases the
circuits' usefulness the least; and we update link_apconn_to_circ()
to do the appropriate bookkeeping.
This commit is contained in:
Nick Mathewson
2011-07-06 17:08:24 -04:00
parent 1d3c8c1f74
commit 773bfaf91e
4 changed files with 75 additions and 3 deletions
+26
View File
@@ -412,6 +412,32 @@ round_uint64_to_next_multiple_of(uint64_t number, uint64_t divisor)
return number;
}
/** Return the number of bits set in <b>v</b>. */
int
n_bits_set_u8(uint8_t v)
{
static const int nybble_table[] = {
0, /* 0000 */
1, /* 0001 */
1, /* 0010 */
2, /* 0011 */
1, /* 0100 */
2, /* 0101 */
2, /* 0110 */
3, /* 0111 */
1, /* 1000 */
2, /* 1001 */
2, /* 1010 */
3, /* 1011 */
2, /* 1100 */
3, /* 1101 */
3, /* 1110 */
4, /* 1111 */
};
return nybble_table[v & 15] + nybble_table[v>>4];
}
/* =====
* String manipulation
* ===== */
+1
View File
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ uint64_t round_to_power_of_2(uint64_t u64);
unsigned round_to_next_multiple_of(unsigned number, unsigned divisor);
uint32_t round_uint32_to_next_multiple_of(uint32_t number, uint32_t divisor);
uint64_t round_uint64_to_next_multiple_of(uint64_t number, uint64_t divisor);
int n_bits_set_u8(uint8_t v);
/* Compute the CEIL of <b>a</b> divided by <b>b</b>, for nonnegative <b>a</b>
* and positive <b>b</b>. Works on integer types only. Not defined if a+b can
+37 -3
View File
@@ -143,18 +143,27 @@ circuit_is_acceptable(const origin_circuit_t *origin_circ,
return 0;
}
}
if (!connection_edge_compatible_with_circuit(conn, origin_circ)) {
/* conn needs to be isolated from other conns that have already used
* origin_circ */
return 0;
}
return 1;
}
/** Return 1 if circuit <b>a</b> is better than circuit <b>b</b> for
* <b>purpose</b>, and return 0 otherwise. Used by circuit_get_best.
* <b>conn</b>, and return 0 otherwise. Used by circuit_get_best.
*/
static int
circuit_is_better(const origin_circuit_t *oa, const origin_circuit_t *ob,
uint8_t purpose)
const edge_connection_t *conn)
{
const circuit_t *a = TO_CIRCUIT(oa);
const circuit_t *b = TO_CIRCUIT(ob);
const uint8_t purpose = conn->_base.purpose;
int a_bits, b_bits;
switch (purpose) {
case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_GENERAL:
@@ -188,6 +197,29 @@ circuit_is_better(const origin_circuit_t *oa, const origin_circuit_t *ob,
return 1;
break;
}
/* XXXX023 Maybe this check should get a higher priority to avoid
* using up circuits too rapidly. */
a_bits = connection_edge_update_circuit_isolation(conn,
(origin_circuit_t*)oa, 1);
b_bits = connection_edge_update_circuit_isolation(conn,
(origin_circuit_t*)ob, 1);
/* if x_bits < 0, then we have not used x for anything; better not to dirty
* a connection if we can help it. */
if (a_bits < 0) {
return 0;
} else if (b_bits < 0) {
return 1;
}
a_bits &= ~ oa->isolation_flags_mixed;
a_bits &= ~ ob->isolation_flags_mixed;
if (n_bits_set_u8(a_bits) < n_bits_set_u8(b_bits)) {
/* The fewer new restrictions we need to make on a circuit for stream
* isolation, the better. */
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
@@ -244,7 +276,7 @@ circuit_get_best(const edge_connection_t *conn,
/* now this is an acceptable circ to hand back. but that doesn't
* mean it's the *best* circ to hand back. try to decide.
*/
if (!best || circuit_is_better(origin_circ,best,purpose))
if (!best || circuit_is_better(origin_circ,best,conn))
best = origin_circ;
}
@@ -1476,6 +1508,8 @@ link_apconn_to_circ(edge_connection_t *apconn, origin_circuit_t *circ,
tor_assert(circ->cpath->prev->state == CPATH_STATE_OPEN);
apconn->cpath_layer = circ->cpath->prev;
}
connection_edge_update_circuit_isolation(apconn, circ, 0);
}
/** Return true iff <b>address</b> is matched by one of the entries in