From 45ea136353bc73af9554023444d313bc14c886f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Mathewson Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 06:18:46 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] shouldn't we say 128, 10 mins, etc? svn:r1054 --- trunk/doc/tor-design.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/trunk/doc/tor-design.tex b/trunk/doc/tor-design.tex index 5ad8602c0e..d7e4eec1e0 100644 --- a/trunk/doc/tor-design.tex +++ b/trunk/doc/tor-design.tex @@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ performance. % Right now the first $500 \times 500\mbox{B}=250\mbox{KB}$ %sendme} acknowledgments arrive. To quantify these effects, we did some informal tests using a network of 4 nodes on the same machine (a heavily loaded 1GHz Athlon). We downloaded a 60 -megabyte file from {\tt debian.org} every 30 minutes for 54 hours (108 sample +megabyte file from {\tt debian.org} every 10 minutes for 21.3 hours (128 sample points). It arrived in about 300 seconds on average, compared to 210s for a direct download. We ran a similar test on the production Tor network, fetching the front page of {\tt cnn.com} (55 kilobytes): while a direct